|
|
| |
Much of the debate about global branding has centered on the question of whether global brands should attempt to speak with one voice around the world, or whether they should adapt to local cultures. A popular strategy for many brands has been to globalize logos, brand names and trademarks, while introducing product variations at the local level. But a few global brands have gone the extra mile and achieved what must be the best of all possible worlds—acceptance as local brands nearly everywhere they do business.
According to marketing professor Niraj Dawar of Canada's University of Western Ontario, the Dutch electronics manufacturer Philips has achieved precisely this sort of worldwide local acceptance. The company, which began as a manufacturer of incandescent lamps and other electrical products in 1891, had by the 1920s established companies in the US, France and Belgium. "Today," says Dawar, "[Philips] is not just a Dutch brand that has gone international, but it is in fact a local brand. People will tell you this in Austria, Australia, India and Canada—there are a number of places around the world where Philips has gone very local."
|
|
| |
Most of the brands that have achieved multilocal status have been around for awhile, although the tie-in is not completely obvious. Dawar explains, "European multinationals, because they went global or multinational before fast communications were available, tended to be very decentralized. They had to allow local managers a lot of autonomy in the way they operated. The brands developed locally [without] centralized global control and weren't able to take advantage of the efficiencies or economies of approaching the market as being a global market."
Some American brands have also achieved multi-local status. According to professor Saeed Samiee of the University of Tulsa in Oklahoma, "In terms of 'localness' of global brands, Parker pens and now defunct Singer sewing machines take the lead. For many years, multiple countries claimed that these brands were of local origin. Germans thought Singer was theirs, the Brits thought the same, and the Americans knew better. Parker was French in France, British in the UK, and American in the US."
Singer is a particularly interesting case. Founded in 1851 in the US, the sewing machine company had expanded into Europe by the 1860s. Initially, Singer relied on overseas commission houses to handle sales, but eventually, in response to the economic nationalism it encountered in Europe, the company decided to form national sales companies and build factories behind the high tariff walls it was encountering. The national companies afforded Singer several trade advantages. They established legal protection with national corporation laws, they offered protection from attacks by competitors, they created a low foreign profile, and they reduced Singer's tax burden.
Singer's decision to begin manufacturing sewing machines in Prussia, for example, came in response to Germany's protective tariffs (of 1896 and 1903). By the early twentieth century the German public so widely accepted Singer sewing machines that they were purchased by the German army—to the embarrassment of Singer's German competitors. Later, during World War II, German aviators avoiding bombing Singer's European factories because the pilots thought the factories were German-owned.
Although Singer made no attempt to localize its product (a Singer sewing machine manufactured in the US was identical to one made anywhere else), the company took pains to localize its corporate footprint overseas. In 1889, for example, Singer's general agent for the Iberian Peninsula wrote, "We must of course go steadily on with the times, but with the times in Spain, and not with the times in America, which is over a century ahead of this country. I believe that any attempt to Americanize or Anglicize this business will be a failure" (Robert Bruce Davies, Peacefully Working to Conquer the World, Arno Press, 1976).
Nine years later (1898), after the US declared war on Spain, Singer's Spanish offices were told to display the Spanish flag, and to "put some posters in a conspicuous position, stating that we are not Americans but that the business belongs to an Englishman established in Spain for the last thirty years" (Davies, Arno Press, 1976).
|
| |
|
Singer so concealed its American connection in Russia that the US consul in Latvia once wrote that the company was "so thoroughly established in Russia...that it can be regarded almost in the light of a Russian enterprise." As it turned out, Singer almost took its localization efforts too far. Between 1912 and 1913, Singer's competitors in the US argued that the sewing machine manufacturer was a foreign company.
But not all multilocal companies trace their beginnings to the nineteenth century. One modern American brand that has achieved widespread local acceptance overseas is McDonald's. The American fast food chain has become such a routine part of the landscape in parts of Asia, for example, that kids may not even be aware of the company's foreign origins. In the book "Golden Arches East," Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney relates a story of Japanese Boy Scouts who were surprised, when traveling abroad, to encounter a McDonald's in Chicago (edited by James L. Watson, Stanford, 1997).
McDonald's began expanding internationally in 1967, twelve years after it began franchising in the US. By 1996, the restaurant chain was operating restaurants in more than 25 foreign countries. In contrast to Singer and Philips, however, McDonald's became multi-local in the absence of trade barriers and at a time when global communications were practically instantaneous; nor have McDonald's overseas restaurants operated independently of the home office.
Although the restaurant chain has made numerous efforts to localize its menu (it offers, for example, salads in the US, lamb burgers in India, vegetarian burgers in the Netherlands, teriyaki burgers in Japan, salmon sandwiches in Norway, frankfurters in Germany, and poached egg burgers in Uruguay), it did not gain local acceptance worldwide by marketing local specialties.
As Harvard's James L. Watson argues in Golden Arches East: McDonald's in East Asia, the secret to the restaurant's global popularity has almost certainly been its French fries, which he writes are "consumed with great gusto by Muslims, Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, vegetarians, communists, Tories, marathoners, and armchair athletes." McDonald's fries have resonated with local tastes in dozens of countries—a fact that is not surprising when one considers that potatoes, consumed by over a billion people around the world, are one of the most recognized foods on earth.
But there's even more to the potato story. According to the University of Western Ontario's Dawar, McCain Foods of Canada is the largest international supplier of French fries to McDonald's. Meanwhile McCain, which markets frozen potato specialties in 100 countries, has itself achieved multi-local acceptance in many of the countries where it does business. The company localizes its product by calling it chips in the UK for instance and developing local advertising for markets and managers by region.
Says Dawar, "In Australia, people think of McCain as an Australian company. In England, people think of McCain as an English company. In Canada, people think of McCain as a Canadian company... McCain is a very local brand in each of the markets in which it operates." A spokesperson for McCain affirmed this view in an email correspondence.
So what, if anything, do French fries have in common with sewing machines and electric lights? Probably quite a lot. When professor Theodore Levitt of Harvard University published his highly influential essay "The Globalization of Markets" in The Harvard Business Review in 1983, he argued that to be successful, modern global companies would have to focus on products that address universal consumer needs or preferences. Levitt specifically cited McDonald's as an example of such a company.
Levitt also pointed out that people everywhere look for ways to alleviate their burdens, acquire more free time, and increase their spending power. There can be no argument that McDonald's success largely rests upon its ability to provide standardized fare at low prices to busy consumers anxious to save time. Same for McCain's frozen potato offerings. In that sense, the two firms' formulas for multi-local acceptance may not be so very different from the path to success taken by Philips and Singer more than a century ago, when they began offering their customers time-saving conveniences at affordable prices. [2-May-2005]
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Randall Frost, a freelance writer based in Pleasanton, California, is the author of The Globalization of Trade. His work has appeared in Worth, The New England Financial Journal, CBSHealthWatch and a variety of educational publications.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Oct 24, 2005
|
Branding, a Job Well Done -- Dale Buss
|
|
|
How do major brands like Costco and Ritz-Carlton become household names without relying on traditional advertising? By tapping into their greatest resource: Employees.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Aug 8, 2005
|
Hotel Brands Break the Chain -- Rob Mitchell
|
|
|
After decades of perfecting the known experience at chains around the world, hotel brands are now trying to create boutique hotels as guests go on a quest for the one-off experience.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jul 25, 2005
|
Best Global Brands: Focus on UBS -- Robin Rusch
|
|
|
Among the top five fastest growing brands on the list of 100 Best Global Brands 2005, Swiss financial services company UBS reflects the work in progress of growing and sustaining a global brand.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jun 20, 2005
|
Growing Pains Small Brands -- Alicia Clegg
|
|
|
How can a brand remain true while broadening its reach? Popular but small brands like Innocent Drinks, Tyrrells and Hill Station risk losing their original fans in their quest to grow bigger.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Apr 18, 2005
|
Dove Gets Real -- Alicia Clegg
|
|
|
Unilever’s Dove is the latest beauty brand to use "real" women to sell product. But can this campaign turn ugly?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Mar 7, 2005
|
Should Global Brands Trash Local Favorites? -- Randall Frost
|
|
|
When P&G, Unilever and Nestlé clean house, they risk losing local markets for beloved brands. Companies like Henkel, on the other hand, retain a portfolio of national and international brands to satisfy both global and local tastes.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2010 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|